Life Cycle
Life Cycle
State-of-the-Art Reviews

Effect of physical activity on COVID-19 and underlying mechanisms

Rosie Kwon1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5422-4446, Abdullah Özgür Yeniova2, Seong Ho Cho3, Min Ji Koo4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey
3Division of Allergy-Immunology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
4Department of Human Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*Correspondence: Rosie Kwon, E-mail: rosiekw@umich.edu

© Copyright 2022 Life Cycle. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Nov 15, 2022; Revised: Dec 21, 2022; Accepted: Dec 24, 2022

Published Online: Dec 27, 2022

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been rapidly transmitted globally since December 2019. As COVID-19 was caused by a novel coronavirus, people only counted on their innate immune system in the early COVID-19 pandemic. However, given that the defense against viral infection depends upon a competent adaptive response, understanding adaptive immunity in SARS-CoV-2 immune responses is critical. This review paper discussed the effect of physical activity on COVID-19 and plausible underlying mechanisms. Therefore, promoting regular physical activity has the potential to mitigate the impact of the pandemic at a personal and societal level. Also, it is important for policymakers to make public health policies concentrating on measures for encouraging physical activities to enhance an individual’s immune system during the pandemic.

Keywords: systematic review; meta-analysis; guideline

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been rapidly transmitted globally since December 2019.[1] Considering that SARS-CoV-2 is highly contagious, it has contaminated people of all ages with respiratory droplets and direct contact transmission.[2] Most confirmed cases are asymptomatic or mild symptoms like fever, cough, and shortness of breath, but the others can be severe or critical and lead to death.[1] Consequently, the pandemic has escalated to more than 500 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, including over 6.5 million deaths globally.[2] Adults with comorbid medical conditions, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and asthma are at high risk of developing severe illnesses from COVID-19.[2, 3] Few children and adolescents have become infected with the COVID-19 virus compared to adults. The severity of COVID-19 in children varied among different ages.[4] This might be because those aged 4 to 13 have higher angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and differential CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations.[5]

2. Pathogenesis of COVID-19

2.1 SARS-CoV-2 Entry

The infection of the cytopathic virus, like SARS-CoV-2, initiates with viral entry, in which the virion recognizes a host cell receptor and fuses its membrane with the host cell membrane.[6] Several studies identified that cells with high ACE2 and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) have strong SARS-CoV-2 binding capacity and are vulnerable to infection.[7] ACE regulates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS), which contains renin, angiotensinogen (ANG), angiotensin I (Ang I), Ang II, and ACE10. Hence, it has been proven that the spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 expressed in epithelial cells of the lung and small intestine.[8] Such that ACE2 serves as a receptor for the virus causing COVID-19.[9] The coronavirus S protein is constituted of S1 and S2 functional subunits with the S1/S2 cleavage site.[9] The viral S glycoprotein interacts with the ectodomain of ACE2 and the complex is endocytosed, leading to decreased surface ACE2 expression.[9] The N-terminal S1 subunit interacts with the ACE2 receptor for initial docking, while the carboxyl-terminal S2 subunit induces the proteolytic fusion between the viral envelope and the cellular membrane by conformational reconfiguration.[10] Subsequently, TMPRSS2 cleaved the multibasic S1/S2 site of the S glycoprotein protein.[10] The association between ACE2 downregulation with the systemic RAS imbalance stimulates the development of multiorgan impairment from SARS-CoV-2 infections.[11]

2.2 Cellular immunity

As COVID-19 was caused by a novel coronavirus, people only counted on their innate immune system in the early COVID-19 pandemic.[12] However, given that the defense against viral infection depends upon a competent adaptive response, understanding adaptive immunity in SARS-CoV-2 immune responses is critical. The immune systems contain the innate immunity activation and memory of three adaptive response compartments; B cells (antibodies synthesis), CD8+ (killer T cells), and CD4+ (helper T cells) lymphocytes.[12] Those CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes recognize viral peptides attached to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II molecules, respectively.[13] CD8+ T cells directly attack and kill infected cells, whereas CD4+ T lymphocytes help B cells and CD8+ T cells and differentiate into helper and effector cells. CD4+ T cells also take charge of cytokine production to drive immune cell recruitment and migration through cytokine secretion. Dysregulation of innate immune response with excessive inflammatory cytokine production causes severe COVID-19 disease.[11] For SARS-CoV-2 infection, TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IFN-α/-γ pro-inflammatory cytokines are secreted. As COVID-19 deteriorates, CD4+ T lymphocytes and CD8+ T lymphocytes gradually decline.[14] Indeed, lymphopenia and reduced CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts are significant manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection.[14]

2.3 Impacts of COVID-19

In the first months of the epidemic, it was confined to China, and its impact on the Chinese economy caused production disruptions and declines. Consequently, the global supply chain was disrupted. A few months later, the outbreak spread worldwide, and eventually, the COVID-19 pandemic became a severe threat to the world and negatively affected most aspects of our lives. Especially measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as social distancing and home confinement, changed lifestyle behavior for children and adolescents.[15] Children could not access school-based physical activities (PAs), including physical education, recess, and commuting to and from school. Besides, classes for youth physical education and activities such as gymnastics, dance, and martial arts have also been canceled or postponed. Several studies confirmed that the COVID-19 outbreak reduced PA and increased prolonged sedentary behavior.[16] Those radical changes in lifestyle behaviors make the loss of muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness, weight gain, poor sleep quality, and poor academic achievements.[16]

3. PA

Technically, PA is not just about sport nor just exercise. It is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscle that requires energy expenditure according to the 2018 Global Action Plan on Physical Activity from World Health Organization (WHO).[17] The health benefits of PA are well verified and have a lower risk of CVD, diabetes, hypertension, strokes, breast cancer, colon cancer, and all causes of death.[18] PA can also positively affect mental health and dementia and help maintain a healthy weight.[19] For school children, it has been found that sufficient PA plays a significant role in physical growth, cognitive functions, and lifelong health. To reap the benefits, WHO and several national governments around the world issued guidelines encouraging the engagement of PA.[20] Guidelines recommend that children aged 5 to 17 should do moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA for more than 60 minutes per day and engage in vigorous-intensity PA at least three days a week. Aerobic PA can improve aerobic capacity and is categorized into vigorous PA and moderate PA.[21] Moderate PA is classified as an activity that causes mild shortness of breath or a slight increase in heart rate; Vigorous PA is an activity that causes shortness of breath, such as fast cycling, fast swimming, jogging, soccer, basketball, and taekwondo.

In addition, as part of their 60 minutes or more of daily PA, they should also do muscle-strengthening PA at least three days a week.[22] Muscle-strengthening exercises include sit-ups, push-ups, and weight lifting. Adults should engage longer time (≥150 min/week of moderate-intensity PA or ≥75 min/week of vigorous-intensity PA) in aerobic activity.

However, previous studies reported that the prevalence of insufficient PA in adolescents and adults is 23% and 81%, respectively.[23] Although global trends in PA engagement in leisure time, occupational PA, and transportation-related PA have decreased because of behavioral and environmental factors like rapid urbanization and increased demand for vehicles.[24] The passive attitude towards the inactivity of PA as considered a personal choice is mistaken. Most people are only aware of the benefits of being physically active, but they seem unaware of the consequences of being physically inactive. The main reason that getting the public to exercise becomes a public health priority is that physical inactivity significantly contributes to deaths from non-communicable diseases such as coronary heart disease, breast and colon cancers, and type 2 diabetes.[25] Among the 36 million deaths yearly from non-communicable diseases, physical inactivity contributes to about 5 million.[25]

lc-2-0-20-g1
Fig. 1. Effect of physical activity on COVID-19 and underlying mechanisms
Download Original Figure

4. Effect of PA on COVID-19 pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of acute respiratory viral infections and the severity of the disease are regulated by the virus and/or dysregulated immune responses.[25] Likewise, as the progression of COVID-19 depends on one’s possessed immune system, the development of the immune system against the virus is critical during the pandemic.[26] Engaging in regular PA has been established to enhance physical and mental health. It has been presented to reduce the risk of adverse health conditions (i.e., obesity, CVD, and diabetes)[27] that increase the adverse effects of COVID-19. Besides the fact that it can improve the immune system, which is likely to have a positive impact on COVID-19 progression.[27]

4.1 PA and ACE2

Indeed, the ACE2 protein mediates the SARS-CoV-2 entry and regulation of angiotensin II. Still, the mechanism underlying that PA positively influences the progression of COVID-19 is unknown. One of the studies reported that PA causes chronic alteration in the concentration of ACE2 serum.[28] The result of the study showed that PA makes higher skeletal muscle ACE2 expression and lower flowing ACE2 levels.[28] Thereupon, ACE2 proteins expressed in skeletal muscle would not be bound to SARS-CoV-2 inhaled through the nasal or lung. Therefore, decreased concentration of ACE2 on the epithelial cell of the lung and small intestine would reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection.

4.2 PA and Cellular Immune System

According to the studies, the most prominent characteristic of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in China was lymphocytopenia (83.2%).[29] Because the white blood cell (WBC) counts in peripheral blood decreased.[29] Also, SARS-CoV-2 attacks the respiratory system, causing pneumonia and lymphopenia in infected individuals. Among the WBC, neutrophils and lymphocytes are critical components of the immune response to coordinate inflammation. It is known that the concentration of neutrophils, leukocytes, and all lymphocyte subsets increases, but the magnitude varies based on the PA intensity and duration throughout the workout period.[30] Moderate-intensity PA facilitates cellular immunity, while prolonged and vigorous-intensity PA without proper rest can activate decreased cellular immunity, increasing the propensity for diseases[30]. Both the number of CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes increase during PA, protecting against SARS-CoV-2 by attacking the virus and memorizing it. A relatively more significant increase in CD8+ T lymphocytes than CD4+ T resulted in depressed CD4/CD8 ratios. For cytokines, PA induces the release of a cascade of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1 receptor antagonists, TNF receptors, and IL-10.[30] With these increased lymphocyte populations throughout the PA, the immune system would be improved to help to fight against COVID-19.

5. Post-COVID-19 syndrome and PA

After the first COVID-19 cases, it has been seen that patients showed persistence of symptoms after the initial COVID-19 related symptoms.[31] These symptoms includes fatigue, muscle pain, low grade fever, cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, headache, and cognitive dysfunction.[32] Prevalence of post-COVID-19 symptoms depends on its definition. Some studies reported symptoms like cough or shortness of breath lasting 6 weeks while some studies reported symptoms like cognitive impairment lasting 6 months after the initial COVID-19 period.[32] As mentioned above physical inactivity has been linked to severe COVID-19 outcomes. Recent studies emphasized the potential benefit of proper and tailored PA on post-COVID-19 syndrome via regulating the immune system, healing functional impairment in cardiopulmonary system, recovering the neurological and biopsychological disturbances.[33]

6. Conclusion

Therefore, promoting regular PA can potentially mitigate the pandemic’s impact at a personal and societal level. Also, it is important for policymakers to make public health policies concentrating on measures for encouraging PAs to enhance an individual’s immune system during the pandemic.

Capsule Summary

This review paper discussed the effect of physical activity on COVID-19 and plausible underlying mechanisms. Therefore, promoting regular physical activity has the potential to mitigate the impact of the pandemic at a personal and societal level.

Acknowledgements

None

Author Contribution

Dr RK, AÖY, and SHC contributed to the preparation of this review.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HV22C0233). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

1.

Kwon R, Rahmati M. Global, regional, and national COVID-19 vaccination rate in 237 countries and territories, March 2022: a systematic analysis for World Health Organization COVID-19 Dashboard, Release 2. Life Cycle. 2022; 2e15

2.

Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020; 395(10242):1973-87

3.

Chen Y, Klein SL, Garibaldi BT, Li H, Wu C, Osevala NM, et al. Aging in COVID-19: Vulnerability, immunity and intervention. Ageing Res Rev. 2021; 65:101205

4.

Offit PA. Bivalent Covid-19 vaccines - a cautionary tale. N Engl J Med. 2023

5.

Zhu L, Lu X, Chen L. Possible causes for decreased susceptibility of children to coronavirus. Pediatr Res. 2020; 88(3):342

6.

Tang T, Bidon M, Jaimes JA, Whittaker GR, Daniel S. Coronavirus membrane fusion mechanism offers a potential target for antiviral development. Antiviral Res. 2020; 178:104792

7.

Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020; 181(2):271-80e8

8.

Zhang X, Tan Y, Ling Y, Lu G, Liu F, Yi Z, et al. Viral and host factors related to the clinical outcome of COVID-19. Nature. 2020; 583(7816):437-40

9.

Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020; 395(10224):565-74

10.

Walls AC, Tortorici MA, Snijder J, Xiong X, Bosch BJ, Rey FA, et al. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(42):11157-62

11.

Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020; 20(6):363-74

12.

Rydyznski Moderbacher C, Ramirez SI, Dan JM, Grifoni A, Hastie KM, Weiskopf D, et al. Antigen-specific adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in acute COVID-19 and associations with age and disease severity. Cell. 2020; 183(4):996-1012e19

13.

Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, et al. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell. 2020; 181(7):1489-501e15

14.

Wong RS, Wu A, To KF, Lee N, Lam CW, Wong CK, et al. Haematological manifestations in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: Retrospective analysis. Bmj. 2003; 326(7403):1358-62

15.

Madigan S, Eirich R, Pador P, McArthur BA, Neville RD. Assessment of changes in child and adolescent screen time during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2022; 176(12):1188-98

16.

Haapala EA, Väistö J, Lintu N, Westgate K, Ekelund U, Poikkeus AM, et al. Physical activity and sedentary time in relation to academic achievement in children. J Sci Med Sport. 2017; 20(6):583-9

17.

Kwon R, Koo MJ, Lee SW, Choi YS, Shin YH, Shin JU, et al. National trends in physical activity among adolescents in South Korea before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2009-2021. J Med Virol. 2023

18.

Lee SW, Lee J, Moon SY, Jin HY, Yang JM, Ogino S, et al. Physical activity and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severe COVID-19 illness and COVID-19 related mortality in South Korea: A nationwide cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2022; 56(16):901-12

19.

Galper DI, Trivedi MH, Barlow CE, Dunn AL, Kampert JB. Inverse association between physical inactivity and mental health in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(1):173-8

20.

Bidzan-Bluma I, Lipowska M. Physical activity and cognitive functioning of children: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4)

21.

Hashida R, Kawaguchi T, Bekki M, Omoto M, Matsuse H, Nago T, et al. Aerobic vs. resistance exercise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review. J Hepatol. 2017; 66(1):142-52

22.

Alves JGB, Alves GV. Effects of physical activity on children’s growth. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2019; 95(Suppl 1):72-8

23.

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(10):e1077-e86

24.

Pratt M, Sarmiento OL, Montes F, Ogilvie D, Marcus BH, Perez LG, et al. The implications of megatrends in information and communication technology and transportation for changes in global physical activity. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):282-93

25.

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29

26.

Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK, Yang YC, Cheng TY, Lee MC, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011; 378(9798):1244-53

27.

Morgan EH, Schoonees A, Sriram U, Faure M, Seguin-Fowler RA. Caregiver involvement in interventions for improving children’s dietary intake and physical activity behaviors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 1(1):Cd012547

28.

Klöting N, Ristow M, Blüher M. Effects of Exercise on ACE2. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020; 28(12):2266-7

29.

Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(18):1708-20

30.

Markov A, Bussweiler J, Helm N, Arntz F, Steidten T, Krohm L, et al. Acute effects of concurrent muscle power and sport-specific endurance exercises on markers of immunological stress response and measures of muscular fitness in highly trained youth male athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 1-12